Legolas and seagulls

[David Dalton]

Sea

see (though that is a nice slip)

my comments on the subject line in the earlier
thread "Luthien Seagull arrives!!!". Why were you
all so dense now and in 1997 that you did not
mention the Legolas and seagulls connection
to me?

and I did not remember that connection until today
and did not remember it in 1996 or 1997 since though I
have read The Lord of the Rings probably four
or five times the last time may have been over
twenty years ago and I did not remember the
Legolas and seagulls details at all and have
not seen the last movie and don't remember it
being in the first two but those came out after
1996 anyway, and even after 1997

David

[Jim Deutch]

Sea my comments on the subject line in the earlier
thread "Luthien Seagull arrives!!!". Why were you
all so dense now and in 1997 that you did not
mention the Legolas and seagulls connection
to me?

I suspect it's mainly because most of us think you're a oops, sorry:
"must...control...fist...of...flamage..."

Jim Deutch (Jimbo the Cat)

[Flame of the West]

Sea my comments on the subject line in the earlier
thread "Luthien Seagull arrives!!!". Why were you
all so dense now and in 1997 that you did not
mention the Legolas and seagulls connection
to me?

Like Dorothy in Wizard of Oz, you wouldn't have believed us -
you had to discover it for yourself.

-- FotW

Reality is for those who cannot cope with Middle-earth.

[Unattended Gorbag]

Post by David Dalton

Sea

see (though that is a nice slip)

my comments on the subject line in the earlier
thread "Luthien Seagull arrives!!!". Why were you
all so dense now and in 1997 that you did not
mention the Legolas and seagulls connection
to me?

and I did not remember that connection until today
and did not remember it in 1996 or 1997 since though I
have read The Lord of the Rings probably four
or five times the last time may have been over
twenty years ago and I did not remember the
Legolas and seagulls details at all and have
not seen the last movie and don't remember it
being in the first two but those came out after
1996 anyway, and even after 1997

It's hard to believe that such an intelligent guy (I had a look at
your net CV) can sound about 13 years old through a usenet post. I
don't mean to be patronizing but try not to use the word "and" so
much and utilize a little punctuation.